Most nonprofits run RFPs like they're buying bodies. They ask for scale. They ask for "performance." Vendors hear "signups." Then the organization spends the next year angry about retention.
Most nonprofits run RFPs like they're buying bodies. They ask for scale. They ask for "performance." Vendors hear "signups." Then the organization spends the next year angry about retention. This isn't a vendor problem. It's a selection and contracting problem.
A retention-first face-to-face RFP should: select for donor survival and payment health, force transparency and auditability, and align incentives to long-run value.
What to include instead:
Score capability and governance, not promises. Weight evidence of retention outcomes, transparency, QA maturity, training maturity, staffing stability, and willingness to align incentives.
Contracts must enforce what you care about: cohort reporting cadence, definitions that prevent gaming, audit rights, consequences for repeated failure, retention-linked incentives, and termination rights.
Sometimes the right answer is in-house or hybrid. Decide with unit economics, not emotion.
If you're about to run an RFP, start with a diagnostic. We'll help you understand the retention requirements before you go to market.