Proof. Outcomes, not vibes.

Face-to-face fundraising has a reputation problem because too many programs sell volume and hide churn. We measure what matters: cohort survival, payment health, and net revenue. This page shows what changes when retention is owned.

What changes

Retention ↑
After standards + QA enforcement
Early churn ↓
Through verification and onboarding improvements
Payment failure ↓
Through prevention and rescue workflows
Forecast stability ↑
After scorecards and cadence

(Note: Specific figures are available in client conversations. These outcomes are representative of the program changes described below.)

Case study framework

Every case study is structured as: Situation (what was happening and what was failing) → Intervention (what changed operationally) → Results (what improved, measured in retention, payment health, and net revenue).

Situation

Volume was strong. Survival was weak.

Situation

The program produced signups but cohorts collapsed in early life. Leadership didn't trust the channel.

Intervention

Donor quality standards, QA rubric, manager coaching cadence, early-life onboarding requirements, and payment health workflow.

Results

Early churn declined, retention increased, and net revenue stabilized. Reporting shifted from volume to cohort survival.

Situation

Vendor incentives drove low-fit acquisition.

Situation

Vendor reporting focused on signups. Contracts did not enforce quality. Internal teams were reactive.

Intervention

Contract alignment, retention-linked incentives, audit rights for QA, scorecards, escalation and enforcement cadence.

Results

Better donor quality, improved retention, less drift, and fewer surprise drops.

Situation

In-house team worked hard. Results swung.

Situation

Performance varied by office and manager. QA existed but didn't change behavior.

Intervention

Coaching playbooks, training refresh, QA feedback loops, leadership metric alignment.

Results

More consistency, faster ramp, better donor experience.

Where this started

Before The Canvass, the same retention-first principles scaled Greenpeace USA's canvass program to 17 locations, 400 staff, and doubled the organization's income in seven years.

Questions about the proof

Can you share detailed numbers publicly?

Sometimes. Often we anonymize. In sales conversations we can go deeper.

What counts as "proof"?

Cohort survival, payment recovery, complaint reduction, break-even improvement.

Start here

If you want face-to-face fundraising that compounds, start with a diagnostic. We'll baseline retention and unit economics, identify the leaks, and give you a plan with owners.